Diplomatic Practice and Russia-Ukraine Conflict: The Role of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO)

Authors

  • Olumba Enyichukwu Department of Political Science, Faculty of Social Sciences, Ignatius Ajuru University of Education, Rumuolumeni, P.M.B, 5047 Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria
  • Nwankwo Evans Onuabuchi Department of Political Science, Faculty of Social Sciences, Ignatius Ajuru University of Education, Rumuolumeni, P.M.B, 5047 Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria
  • Luke Grace Mkpaofiek Department of Political Science, Faculty of Social Sciences, Ignatius Ajuru University of Education, Rumuolumeni, P.M.B, 5047 Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria
  • Aande Bolaji Department of Political Science, Faculty of Social Sciences, Ignatius Ajuru University of Education, Rumuolumeni, P.M.B, 5047 Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria
  • Ihetu Egondu Uloma Department of Political Science, Faculty of Social Sciences, Ignatius Ajuru University of Education, Rumuolumeni, P.M.B, 5047 Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria
  • Rufus Piologalam Matthew Department of Political Science, Faculty of Social Sciences, Ignatius Ajuru University of Education, Rumuolumeni, P.M.B, 5047 Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51699/mjssh.v2i11.727

Keywords:

Diplomacy, Practice, Conflict

Abstract

This study examined the diplomatic practices employed by the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) in response to the Russia-Ukraine conflict, with a focus on crisis management, political engagements, and efforts to promote dialogue and conflict resolution. The research problem centres on exploring the challenges faced by NATO in effectively addressing the conflict while balancing differing member state interests and the delicate interplay between deterrence and de-escalation. The key objectives are to analyze NATO’s diplomatic practices and identify the obstacles hindering its approach. The study adopted the Realism theory as the theoretical framework and utilized a qualitative research methodology, including literature review and analysis of official NATO statements and documents. The findings revealed NATO’s commitment to collective defense, but also the complexities in aligning diverse member States’ interests. Despite diplomatic efforts, the conflict remains unresolved, underscoring the need for continued cooperation and dialogue. The conclusion highlighted that NATO’s diplomatic practices in response to the Russia-Ukraine conflict demonstrated its commitment to regional security and stability. The study recommended among others that, NATO must actively work to strengthen alliance cohesion by fostering open dialogue and understanding among member States. This can be achieved through regular consultations and forums should be established to address divergent views and build consensus on collective security issues.

References

Allison, R. (2015). Russia, the West, and the Ukraine crisis. Chatham House.

Berridge, G. R. (2015). Diplomacy: Theory and practice (5th ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.

Brown, M. (2015). Managing conflict in organizations (3rd ed.). Routledge.

Brown, M. (2016). NATO and the Ukraine crisis: Collective security or strategic expediency? International Affairs, 92(3), 635-654.

Brown, M. (2018). NATO-Russia relations and the Ukraine crisis. European Security, 27(3), 341-359.

Brown, M. (2021). NATO’s diplomacy in the Russia-Ukraine conflict: A case study analysis. Diplomatic Studies Quarterly, 29(4), 511-530.

D’Anieri, P. (2017). Understanding Ukrainian politics: Power, politics, and institutional design. University of Toronto Press.

Davies, R. (2015). Russia and Ukraine: Sanctions and the failure of diplomacy. The World Today, 71(4), 13-15.

Deutsch, M., Coleman, P. T., & Marcus, E. C. (2006). The Handbook of conflict resolution: Theory and practice (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Duckitt, J. (2006). Differential effects of right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation on outgroup attitudes and their mediation by threat from and competitiveness to outgroups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(5), 684-696.

Fesenko, V. (2014). Ukraine's political crisis: From protest to anti-maidan. PONARS Eurasia Policy Memo, No. 322.

Fetherston, A. B. (2017). The practice of diplomacy: Its evolution, theory and administration. Routledge.

Fischer, S. (2004). A history of diplomacy. Polity Press.

Gavrilescu, C. (2015). Crimea and the black sea region: Conflict, identity, and power. Routledge.

Gleditsch, N. P., & Weidmann, N. B. (2012). Richardson in the information age: Geographic information systems and spatial data in international studies. Annual Review of Political Science, 15, 461-481.

Hill, F. (2016). The Minsk process: A model for multilateral diplomacy? International Affairs, 92(3), 545-563.

Jones, A. (2016). NATO in the Post-Cold War era: Adapting to new challenges. Journal of International Relations, 42(3), 227-242.

Jones, S. (2016). NATO and the Ukraine crisis: Managing European deterrence. International Affairs, 92(3), 499-518.

Jones, S. (2017). NATO's Eastern flank: Facing the Russian challenge. Survival, 59(2), 53-66.

Karagiannis, E. (2017). Why Ukraine is still in crisis. Survival, 59(2), 109-128.

Kofman, M. (2015). Reassessing the balance of power in the Donbas. War on the Rocks.

Kumar, R. (2022): Role of NATO in Russia-Ukraine conflict. International Journal of Management and Social Science Research Review, 9(8), 39-44.

Kuzio, T. (2017). Ukraine: Democratization, corruption, and the new Russian imperialism. Praeger.

Kuzio, T. (2018). Crimea: From Soviet Socialist Republic to annexation. In M. Bassin (Ed.), The Palgrave Handbook of Ethnicity. Palgrave Macmillan.

Mearsheimer, J. (2017). Bound to fail: The rise and fall of the Liberal International Order. International Security, 43(4), 7-50.

Morgenthau, H. J. (1948). Politics among nations: The struggle for power and peace. Alfred A. Knopf.

Motyl, A. (2015). The myth of the 'New Cold War': Ukraine as a moral panic. Nationalities Papers, 43(3), 345-355.

NATO. (1952). The North Atlantic Treaty Organisation. https://www.nato.int/cps/ic/natohq/official_texts_17120.htm

Nicolson, H. (1982). Diplomacy (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Nicolson, H. (2010). The evolution of diplomatic practice. In H. Nicolson (Ed.) Diplomacy (pp. 77-96). Oxford University Press.

Petrov, N. (2016). Conflict in Ukraine: An unnecessary war. Routledge.

Rahim, M. A. (2017). Managing conflict in organisations (4th ed.). Routledge.

Satow, E. (2018). Guide to diplomatic practice (6th ed.). Routledge.

Smith, J. (2015). NATO's response to the crisis in Ukraine. NATO Review, 63(1), 10-13.

Smith, J. (2017). NATO and the Eastern flank: Balancing deterrence and dialogue. NATO Review, 65(2), 12-15.

Thakur, R., & Weiss, T. G. (2010). The Oxford Handbook of United Nations Peacekeeping Operations. Oxford University Press.

Williams, R. (2019). Challenges and opportunities for NATO in the Russia-Ukraine conflict. Security and Defense Analysis, 25(1), 73-91.

Wilson, A. (2005). Virtual politics: Faking democracy in the Post-Soviet World. Yale University Press.

Wilson, E. (2018). NATO and the European Union: Partners in security. Routledge.

Wilson, E. (2019). NATO and Russia: Beyond the Cold War? International Affairs, 95(4), 779-797.

Zartman, I. W., & Touval, S. (2010). International mediation in the Post-Cold War Era. Routledge.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-23

How to Cite

Enyichukwu, O., Onuabuchi, N. E., Mkpaofiek, L. G., Bolaji, A., Uloma, I. E., & Matthew, R. P. (2023). Diplomatic Practice and Russia-Ukraine Conflict: The Role of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO). Modern Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(11), 22–32. https://doi.org/10.51699/mjssh.v2i11.727

Issue

Section

Articles