Adaptation of Village Government Management in the Digital Era: Phenomenographic Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51699/mjssh.v3i1.753Keywords:
individual, organizational, importance of system capacitiesAbstract
This research aims to create a change in the model of village government management in accordance with the community needs in this digital era. The study was conducted in two villages: Kalisampurno Village and Kludan Village, located in the Tanggulangin Subdistrict, Sidoarjo Regency, East Java. As the rural community needs in this digital era have changed, village governments have to change their management systems as the form of updated strategy. However, such a brand-new strategy often fails due to the lack of institutional capacity and the abilities of village government officials. In addition, the community's knowledge of technology influences their ability to adapt to technological advancements. This study employs a qualitative approach and with phenomenological methodology. Research data were collected through observations, interviews, and Focus Group Discussions. The study has indicated that the governance of Kalisampurno and Kludan villages showed poor result of change management strategy implementation as their officials display ineffective functions, unefficient organization, and poor village policy management.
References
M. Mukhsin, “The Role of Information and Communication Technology Implementing Village Information Systems in Publicating Village Information in the Era of Globalization,” Teknokom, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 7–15, 2020, doi: 10.31943/teknokom.v3i1.43.
T. S. L. Sanjung Koniswara, “Situational Leadership Style on Employee Work Motivation at PT Garuda Indonesia ( Persero ) Tbk,” J. Manag. Account. Sci., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2019.
E. W. Pahlawan, A. Wijayanti, and S. Suhendro, “The influence of village apparatus competence, internal control system, use of information technology and community participation on accountability in village fund management,” Indones. Account. J., vol. 2, no. 2, p. 162, 2020, doi: 10.32400/iaj.29261.
A. Aprilia, “Public Services at the Population and Civil Registry Agency,” Thesis, Grobogan Regency, 2008.
R. W. Wuri, “Journal of Management and Accounting Science.” [Online]. Available: https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/jurnaleksekutif
S. Bowles, Microeconomics: Behavior, Institutions, and Evolution. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2003.
H. Wang, J. Feng, H. Zhang, and X. Li, “The effect of digital transformation strategy on performance: The moderating role of cognitive conflict,” Int. J. Confl. Manag., vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 441–462, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1108/IJCMA-09-2019-0166.
M. Lipsky, Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of The Individual in Public Services. New York: Russel Sage Foundation, 2010.
Goodman et al., “Identifying and Defining the dimension of community capacity to provide a basis for measurement,” Health Educ. Behav., vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 258–278, 1998.
Morison, Actionable Learning: A Handbook for Capacity Building Through Case Based Learning. 2001.
M. S. Grindle, Ed., Getting Good Government: Capacity Building in The Public Sector of Developing Countries. Harvard University Press, 1997.
F. Marton, “Phenomenography- A research approach to investigating different understandings of reality,” J. Thought, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 28–49, 1986.
