Instrument of Performance Assessment of State Higher Education Employees Public Service Agency Based on Strategic Plans and Competitive Advantage

Authors

  • S. Sriyono Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • S. Sutoyo Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Asep Saepudin Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Afni Sirait Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51699/mjssh.v3i2.755

Keywords:

employee performance assessment, PTN PK-BLU, strategic business plan, institutional excellence

Abstract

The government issued Government Regulation (PP) No. 30 of 2019 which essentially evaluates the performance of employees based on results and is derived from the performance of the institution. PTN PK-BLU that are given financial flexibility is required to improve the quality of their service and financial performance based on strategic plans and institutional excellence. Government agencies enforce the implementation of PP No. 30 of 2019, issuing regulations regarding the transfer of administrative positions to functional positions as regulated in the Regulation of Minister of PANRB No. 6 of 2022 on Performance Management of State Civil Apparatus Employees. This study aims to analyze the effect of a performance appraisal system based on business strategic plans and the advantages of PTN PK-BLU based on PP No. 30 of 2019. This study uses a qualitative descriptive approach conducted at the Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Yogyakarta. The results showed that there was a change in the preparation of the SKP for lecturers and employees based on employee performance appraisals. Performance assessment uses a rubric whose indicators are adjusted to the strategic plan, all of which will relate to the achievement of the Key Performance Indicators.

References

A. J. Mustafa, “Mendobrak Kendala dan Mitos Penilaian Kinerja PNS.” [Online]. Available: https://kumparan.com/adi-junjunan-mustafa/mendobrak-kendala-dan-mitos-penilaian-kinerja-pns-1ulQrGSAMP8

Pemerintah Republik Indonesia, Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 2014 Tentang Aparatur Sipil Negara (ASN). 2014.

Pemerintah Republik Indonesia, Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 11 Tahun 2017 tentang Manajemen PNS. 2017.

Pemerintah Republik Indonesia, Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 30 Tahun 2019 tentang Penilaian Kinerja PNS. 2019.

Pemerintah Republik Indonesia, Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 46 Tahun 2011 tentang Penilaian Prestasi Kerja PNS. 2011.

Menteri Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi Republik Indonesia, Peraturan Menteri Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara Dan Reformasi Birokrasi Republik Indonesia Nomor 12 Tahun 2015 Tentang Pedoman Evaluasi Atas Implementasi Sistem Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah. 2015.

F. F. Rahmadhani, “ANALISIS KEBUTUHAN PERSIAPAN PENERAPAN SERTIFIKASI SISTEM PENJAMINAN MUTU ISO 9001:2015 PADA PUSAT PENGEMBANGAN SUMBER DAYA MANUSIA APARATUR KEMENTERIAN ESDM,” Bachelor’s thesis, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, 2017.

S. Firdausy and U. N. Hanifah, “Permasalahan Manajemen Kinerja di Indonesia dan Upaya Kementerian PANRB untuk Mengatasinya.” [Online]. Available: http://rbkunwas.menpan.go.id/artikel/artikel-rbkunwas/434-permasalahanmanajemen-kinerja-di-indonesia-dan-upaya-kementerian-panrb-untukmengatasinya

S. P. Robbins, Essentials of Organizational Behavior, Fourth. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1994.

I. Fahmi, Manajemen: Teori, Kasus, dan Solusi. Bandung: CV. Alfabeta, 2014.

I. Bastian, Akuntansi Sektor Publik, Edisi Pertama. Yogyakarta: Badan Penerbit Fakultas Ekonomi UGM, 2001.

I. N. Uha, Budaya Organisasi Kepemimpinan dan Kinerja: Proses Terbentuk, Tumbuh Kembang, Dinamika, dan Kinerja Organisasi, Pertama. Jakarta: Kencana Prenadamedia Group, 2013.

R. W. Ruekert, O. C. Walker, and K. J. Roering, “The organization of marketing activities: A contingency theory of structure and performance,” J. Mark., vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 13–25, 1985.

C. Homburg, H. Krohmer, and J. P. Workman, “Strategic Consensus and Performance: The Role of Strategy Type and Market-Related Dynamism,” Strateg. Manag. J., vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 339–357, 1999.

N. Carter, P. Day, and R. Klein, How Organizations Measure Success. London: Routledge, 1992.

G. Boyne and J. Gould-Williams, “Planning and performance in public organizations: An empirical analysis,” Public Manag. Rev., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 115–132, 2003.

G. A. Brewer and S. C. Selden, “Why Elephants Gallop: Assessing and Predicting Organizational Performance in Federal Agencies,” J. Public Adm. Res. Theory, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 685–712, Oct. 2000, doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024287.

J. Galbraith, Designing Complex Organization. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1973.

I. Wursanto, Dasar-dasar Ilmu Organisasi, Pertama. Yogyakarta: ANDI, 2003.

Gudono, Teori Organisasi, Edisi Ketiga. Yogyakarta: BPFE, 2014.

D. T. Otley, “The Contingency Theory of Management Accounting: Achievement and Prognosis,” Account. Organ. Soc., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 413–428, 1980.

R. H. Chenhall, “Management control system design within its organizational context: Findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future,” Account. Organ. Soc., vol. 28, no. 2–3, pp. 127–168, 2003.

T. Poister, M. P. Aritigueta, and J. L. Hall, “Managing and Measuring Performance In Public and Nonprofit Organizations: An Integrated Approach,” Wiley Sons, 2015.

Downloads

Published

2024-03-06

How to Cite

Sriyono, S., Sutoyo, S., Saepudin, A. ., & Sirait, A. (2024). Instrument of Performance Assessment of State Higher Education Employees Public Service Agency Based on Strategic Plans and Competitive Advantage. Modern Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 3(2), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.51699/mjssh.v3i2.755

Issue

Section

Articles